Targeted because of tattoos?

American Kayle Leogrande who rides for Rock Racing is said to have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency alleging that it planned to test his B urine sample after his A sample tested negative. Associated Press reported on Thursday that an anonymous professional cyclist had filed a lawsuit against USADA on behalf of “John Doe” seeking an injunction to prevent the anti-doping agency from ever testing the B sample. The lawsuit, filed on January 23 in Los Angeles County Superior Court, claims that USADA originally planned to test the B sample on January 15, but back-tracked after “John Doe’s” attorneys demanded the agency abandon the second test.
USADA’S Bill Bock said on Friday that that the testing of a B sample after a negative A sample “is not prohibited, and certainly we believe it to be permissible.” Bock described the lawsuit as “utterly frivolous and morally bankrupt.” The urine test in question occurred at Superweek, where Leogrande won three events, finished second at three events and placed second overall.
It is claimed that USADA is collecting testimony from witnesses who have alleged that Leogrande has admitted doping. Such testimony is admissable under provisions of the WADA code that allow the use of non-analytical evidence in building a case for an alleged doping violation.
Rock Racing has made headlines for signing former ProTour riders whose careers were marked by doping scandals, including Tyler Hamilton, Santiago Botero and Oscar Sevilla and has had discussions with Floyd Landis. It is Landis’s attorney who is acting for “John Doe”.
Leogrande runs Classic Tattoo Studio in Mailbu, California, and exhibits his company’s artwork on his limbs, head and neck. Rock Racing’s owner Ball has suggested Leogrande’s appearance might be one reason he is being targeted. “It’s got to be shocking to see Kayle with full sleeves,” Ball said in November. “It must be shocking to those that are conservative and don’t get it and don’t want that in this sport. Some people, for some reason, their prejudices take them to a completely different level. And because they are in power, they think they can apply that power to an individual.” “There is someone out there that has a huge hard-on for that man and is looking to take him down, for whatever reason. As far as Kayle is concerned, I will support him.”
As I understand it “John Doe’s” case is that as positive A and B tests are required to constitute a positive test and testing the B sample following a negative A sample can only be construed as harassment. Well yes and no. If the A test was just on the negative side of the line wouldn’t it be reasonable to take a second bite at the cherry and if it came back positive then warn the rider.
What cannot be justified, if true, is the claim that USADA informed race organisers that the rider was under investigation based only on one negative sample. That stinks. As to Ball’s allegation of tattoophobia I don’t know enough about American society to comment other than I can’t see Leogrande’s moving picture show going down well with the “blazer brigade.”
pretty scary eh?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: